Creditors' guide to liquidators' fees

England and Wales

1 Introduction

1.1     When a company goes into liquidation the costs of the proceedings are paid out of its assets. The creditors, who hope to recover some of their debts out of the assets, therefore have a direct interest in the level of costs, and in particular the remuneration of the insolvency practitioner appointed to act as liquidator. The insolvency legislation recognises this interest by providing mechanisms for creditors to fix the basis of the liquidator’s fees. This guide is intended to help creditors be aware of their rights to approve and monitor fees and explains the basis on which fees are fixed.

2 Liquidation procedure

2.1     Liquidation (or ‘winding up’) is the most common type of corporate insolvency procedure. Liquidation is the formal winding up of a company’s affairs entailing the realisation of its assets and the distribution of the proceeds in a prescribed order of priority. Liquidation may be either voluntary, when it is instituted by resolution of the shareholders, or compulsory, when it is instituted by order of the court.

2.2     Voluntary liquidation is the more common of the two. An insolvent voluntary liquidation is called a creditors’ voluntary liquidation (often abbreviated to ‘CVL’). In this type of liquidation an insolvency practitioner acts as liquidator throughout and the creditors can vote on the appointment of the liquidator at the first meeting of creditors.

2.3     In a compulsory liquidation on the other hand, the function of liquidator is, in most cases, initially performed not by an insolvency practitioner but by an official called the official receiver. The official receiver is an officer of the court and a member of The Insolvency Service, an executive agency within the Department of Trade and Industry. In most compulsory liquidations, the official receiver becomes liquidator immediately on the making of the winding-up order. Where there are significant assets an insolvency practitioner will usually be appointed to act as liquidator in place of the official receiver, either at a meeting of creditors convened for the purpose or directly by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. Where an insolvency practitioner is not appointed the official receiver remains liquidator.

2.4     Where a compulsory liquidation follows immediately on an administration the court may appoint the former administrator to act as liquidator. In such cases the official receiver does not become liquidator. An administrator may also subsequently act as liquidator in a CVL.

3 The liquidation committee

3.1     In a liquidation (whether voluntary or compulsory) the creditors have the right to appoint a committee called the liquidation committee, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 members, to monitor the conduct of the liquidation and approve the liquidator’s fees. The committee is usually established at the creditors’ meeting which appoints the liquidator, but in cases where a liquidation follows immediately on an administration any committee established for the purposes of the administration will continue in being as the liquidation committee.

3.2     The liquidator must call the first meeting of the committee within 3 months of its establishment (or his appointment if that is later), and subsequent meetings must be held either at specified dates agreed by the committee, or when requested by a member of the committee, or when the liquidator decides he needs to hold one. The liquidator is required to report to the committee at least every 6 months on the progress of the liquidation, unless the committee directs otherwise. This provides an opportunity for the committee to monitor and discuss the progress of the insolvency and the level of the liquidator’s fees.

4 Fixing the liquidator’s fees

4.1     The basis for fixing the liquidator’s remuneration is set out in Rules 4.127 – 4.127B of the Insolvency Rules 1986. The Rules state that the remuneration shall be fixed either:

  • as a percentage of the value of the assets which are realised or distributed or both, or
  • by reference to the time properly given by the liquidator and his staff in attending to matters arising in the liquidation.

It is for the liquidation committee (if there is one) to determine on which of these bases the remuneration is to be fixed, and if it is to be fixed as a percentage, to fix the percentage to be applied. Rule 4.127 says that in arriving at its decision the committee shall have regard to the following matters: 

  • the complexity (or otherwise) of the case;
  • any responsibility of an exceptional kind or degree which falls on the liquidator in connection with the insolvency; 
  • the effectiveness with which the liquidator appears to be carrying out, or to have carried out, his duties; 
  • the value and nature of the assets which the liquidator has to deal with.

4.2     If there is no liquidation committee, or the committee does not make the requisite determination, the liquidator’s remuneration may be fixed by a resolution of a meeting of creditors. The creditors take account of the same matters as the committee would. A resolution specifying the terms on which the liquidator is to be remunerated may be taken at the meeting which appoints the liquidator. If the remuneration is not fixed in any of these ways, it will be in accordance with a scale set out in the Rules.

5 What information should be provided by the liquidator?

5.1     When seeking fee approval

5.1.1  When seeking agreement to his fees the liquidator should provide sufficient supporting information to enable the committee or the creditors to form a judgement as to whether the proposed fee is reasonable having regard to all the circumstances of the case. The nature and extent of the supporting information which should be provided will depend on:

  • the nature of the approval being sought;
  • the stage during the administration of the case at which it is being sought; and
  • the size and complexity of the case. 

5.1.2  Where, at any creditors’ or committee meeting, the liquidator seeks agreement to the terms on which he is to be remunerated, he should provide the meeting with details of the charge-out rates of all grades of staff, including principals, which are likely to be involved on the case.

5.1.3  Where the liquidator seeks agreement to his fees during the course of the liquidation, he should always provide an up to date receipts and payments account. Where the proposed fee is based on time costs the liquidator should disclose to the committee or the creditors the time spent and the charge-out value in the particular case, together with, where appropriate, such additional information as may reasonably be required having regard to the size and complexity of the case. The additional information should comprise a sufficient explanation of what the liquidator has achieved and how it was achieved to enable the value of the exercise to be assessed (whilst recognising that the liquidator must fulfil certain statutory obligations that might be seen to bring no added value for creditors) and to establish that the time has been properly spent on the case. That assessment will need to be made having regard to the time spent and the rates at which that time was charged, bearing in mind the factors set out in paragraph 4.1 above. To enable this assessment to be carried out it may be necessary for the liquidator to provide an analysis of the time spent on the case by type of activity and grade of staff.
The degree of detail will depend on the circumstances of the case, but it will be helpful to be aware of the professional guidance which has been given to insolvency practitioners on this subject. The guidance suggests the following areas of activity as a basis for the analysis of time spent:

  • Administration and planning
  • Investigations
  • Realisation of assets
  • Trading
  • Creditors
  • Any other case-specific matters

The following categories are suggested as a basis for analysis by grade of staff:

  • Partner
  • Manager
  • Other senior professionals
  • Assistants and support staff

The explanation of what has been done can be expected to include an outline of the nature of the assignment and the liquidator’s own initial assessment, including the anticipated return to creditors. To the extent applicable it should also explain:

  • Any significant aspects of the case, particularly those that affect the amount of time spent.
  • The reasons for subsequent changes in strategy.
  • Any comments on any figures in the summary of time spent accompanying the request the liquidator wishes to make.
  • The steps taken to establish the views of creditors, particularly in relation to agreeing the strategy for the assignment, budgeting, time recording, fee drawing or fee agreement.
  • Any existing agreement about fees.

Details of how other professionals, including subcontractors, were chosen, how they were contracted to be paid, and what steps have been taken to review their fees.

It should be borne in mind that the degree of analysis and form of presentation should be proportionate to the size and complexity of the case. In smaller cases not all categories of activity will always be relevant, whilst further analysis may be necessary in larger cases.

5.1.4    Where the fee is charged on a percentage basis the liquidator should provide details of any work which has been or is intended to be sub-contracted out which would normally be undertaken directly by a liquidator or his staff.

5.2      After fee approval
Where a resolution fixing the basis of fees is passed at any creditors’ meeting held before he has substantially completed his functions, the liquidator should notify the creditors of the details of the resolution in his next report or circular to them. When subsequently reporting to creditors on the progress of the liquidation, or submitting his final report, he should specify the amount of remuneration he has drawn in accordance with the resolution. Where the fee is based on time costs he should also provide details of the time spent and charge-out value to date and any material changes in the rates charged for the various grades since the resolution was first passed. He should also provide such additional information as may be required in accordance with the principles set out in paragraph 5.1.3. Where the fee is charged on a percentage basis the liquidator should provide the details set out in paragraph 5.1.4 above regarding work which has been sub-contracted out.

5.3     Expenses and disbursements
There is no statutory requirement for the committee or the creditors to approve the drawing of expenses or disbursements. However, professional guidance issued to insolvency practitioners requires that, where the liquidator proposes to recover costs which, whilst being in the nature of expenses or disbursements, may include an element of shared or allocated costs (such as room hire, document storage or communication facilities provided by the liquidator’s own firm), they must be disclosed and be authorised by those responsible for approving his remuneration. Such expenses must be directly incurred on the case and subject to a reasonable method of calculation and allocation.

5.4     Realisations for secured creditors
Where the liquidator realises an asset on behalf of a secured creditor and receives remuneration out of the proceeds (see paragraph 8.1 below), he should disclose the amount of that remuneration to the committee (if there is one), to any meeting of creditors convened for the purpose of determining his fees, and in any reports he sends to creditors.

5.5     Reporting in compulsory liquidations
It should be borne in mind that in compulsory liquidations there is no statutory requirement for the liquidator to report to creditors until the conclusion of the assignment. In most such cases, therefore, creditors will receive no information during the course of the liquidation unless they specifically request it.

6 What if a creditor is dissatisfied?

6.1     Except in cases where there is a liquidation committee it is the creditors as a body who have authority to approve the liquidator’s fees. To enable them to carry out this function they may require the liquidator to call a creditors’ meeting. In order to do this at least ten per cent in value of the creditors must concur with the request, which must be made to the liquidator in writing.

6.2     If a creditor believes that the liquidator’s remuneration is too high he may, if at least 25 per cent in value of the creditors (including himself) agree, apply to the court for an order that it be reduced. If the court does not dismiss the application (which it may if it considers that insufficient cause is shown) the applicant must give the liquidator a copy of the application and supporting evidence at least 14 days before the hearing. Unless the court orders otherwise, the costs must by paid by the applicant and not out of the assets of the insolvent company.

7 What if the liquidator is dissatisfied?

7.1     If the liquidator considers that the remuneration fixed by the committee is insufficient he may request that it be increased by resolution of the creditors. If he considers that the remuneration fixed by the committee or the creditors or in accordance with the statutory scale is insufficient, he may apply to the court for it to be increased. If he decides to apply to the court he must give at least 14 days’ notice to the members of the committee and the committee may nominate one or more of its members to appear or be represented at the court hearing. If there is no committee, the liquidator’s notice of his application must be sent to such of the creditors as the court may direct, and they may nominate one or more of their number to appear or be represented. The court may order the costs to be paid out of the assets.

8 Other matters relating to fees

8.1     Where the liquidator realises assets on behalf of a secured creditor he is entitled to be remunerated out of the proceeds of sale in accordance with a scale set out in the Rules. Usually, however, the liquidator will agree the basis of his fee for dealing with charged assets with the secured creditor concerned.

8.2     Where two (or more) joint liquidators are appointed it is for them to agree between themselves how the remuneration payable should be apportioned. Any dispute between them may be referred to the court, the committee or a meeting of creditors.

8.3     If the appointed liquidator is a solicitor and employs his own firm to act in the insolvency, profit costs may not be paid unless authorised by the committee, the creditors or the court.

8.4     There may also be occasions when creditors will agree to make funds available themselves to pay for the liquidator to carry out tasks which cannot be paid for out of the assets, either because they are deficient or because it is uncertain whether the work undertaken will result in any benefit to creditors. Arrangements of this kind are sometimes made to fund litigation or investigations into the affairs of the insolvent company. Any arrangements of this nature will be a matter for agreement between the liquidator and the creditors concerned and will not be subject to the statutory rules relating to remuneration.

9. Provision of information – additional requirements

9.1     In any case where the liquidator is appointed on or after 1 April 2005 he must provide certain information about the time spent on the case, free of charge, upon request by any creditor, director or shareholder of the company.
The information which must be provided is –

  • the total number of hours spent on the case by the liquidator or staff assigned to the case;
  • for each grade of staff, the average hourly rate at which they are charged out;
  • the number of hours spent by each grade of staff in the relevant period.

The period for which the information must be provided is the period from appointment to the end of the most recent period of six months reckoned from the date of the liquidator’s appointment, or where he has vacated office, the date that he vacated office.
The information must be provided within 28 days of receipt of the request by the liquidator, and requests must be made within two years from vacation of office.

London office charge out rates

To view the charge out rates for UHY Hacker Young turnaround and recovery in London, please download the document 'London office turnaround and recovery charge out rates'.

Manchester office charge out rates

To view the charge out rates for UHY Hacker Young turnaround and recovery in Manchester, please download the document 'Manchester office turnaround and recovery charge out rates'.

Latest news

Statement from Peter Kubik, Partner at national accountancy group UHY Hacker Young, on the administration of Convers Sports Initiative plc

Andrew Andronikou and Peter Kubik were appointed as Joint Administrators to Convers Sport Initiative plc (CSI).
read more...

The Joint Administrators of Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd announce the Club's exit from Administration

The Joint Administrators of Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd, Andrew Andronikou, Peter Kubik and Michael Kiely, would like to announce the completion of the Club’s Company Voluntary Arrangement and exit from Administration on 24 February 2011.
read more...

Our proposed modifications to the CVA proposals of Portsmouth FC and revised proposals for achieving the Administration's purpose

Our Joint Administrators Andrew Andronikou, Peter Kubik and Michael Kiely have issued a statement setting out proposed modifications to their CVA proposals and a statement setting out their revised proposals for achieving the purpose of the Administration.
read more...

Percentage of petitions submitted by HMRC to wind-up companies jumps by a third in just one year

HMRC was responsible for 58% of all the petitions submitted over the last year to wind-up companies compared to just 43% in the previous year, reveals research by UHY Hacker Young.


read more...

Sale of Portsmouth Football Club completed

We, the Administrators of Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd, are pleased to announce that negotiations between the various parties concerning the sale of the club have now been satisfactorily concluded and the club has now been formally sold.

read more...

Portsmouth City Football Club - Six Month Progress Report to Creditors

Our Joint Administrators Andrew Andronikou, Peter Kubik and Michael Kiely have issued their Six Month Report to Creditors, in accordance with R2.47 Insolvency Rules 1986.
read more...

Portsmouth City Football Club - Chairman's report on the meeting of creditors and members held on 17th June 2010

The proposal for a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) was approved on 17th June 2010 without modifications by creditors and members. On the first vote 81.3% of the unsecured creditors voted in favour of the proposal.
read more...

Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd - Notice of creditors' meeting

In accordance with Paragraph 51 of Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986, a creditors’ meeting has been convened at Portsmouth City Football Club on 6th May at 11am. The meeting is restricted to creditors and their representatives only.
read more...

New Chief Executive for Portsmouth Football Club

Andrew Andronikou, of UHY Hacker Young and the administrator of Portsmouth Football Club, announces today that he has secured the appointment of a new Chief Executive to take the Club forward.

read more...

Portsmouth Football Club update – Peter Storrie, Chief Executive of Portsmouth Football, leaves his employment with the club

The joint administrators at UHY Hacker Young have announced this evening that Mr Storrie, the Chief Executive of Portsmouth City Football Club, has after talks with his family and friends decided it is in the best interest of the club for him to leave his full time employment.
read more...

Statement from Andrew Andronikou, Partner at UHY Hacker Young, on the administration of Portsmouth Football Club

Statement from Andrew Andronikou, Partner at UHY Hacker Young, on the administration of Portsmouth Football Club.
read more...

35 years after the last banking crisis, Britain’s longest-running insolvency case finally ends!

One of Britain’s longest-running insolvency cases has been concluded more than 35 years after it was caused by the last banking crisis, according to the liquidators, UHY Hacker Young, the national accountancy group.

read more...

Brookside Close to take centre stage at auction

Our Manchester office has been appointed receivers of Brookside Close, the legendary Liverpool cud-de-sac where the popular Channel 4 soap opera Brookside was filmed until 2003.
read more...

Our London office appointed administrators of Butler and Tanner Printers Ltd

Andrew Andronikou and Peter Kubik, Partners at our London office Turnaround and Recovery Department have been appointed administrators of the assets of Butler and Tanner Printers Ltd.
read more...

Select Retail in Administration

Select Retail, the national women’s fashion retailer, was placed into Administration on Friday 22nd February 2008, against a backdrop of its deteriorating trading performance in the first quarter of 2008. Our Turnaround and Recovery specialists moved quickly to evaluate the business and negotiate the sale of approximately half of the 250 retail units to a management buy-out team.

read more...

Restaurants three times more likely to go bust than other businesses

Restaurants and bars are three times more likely to go bust than other UK businesses, a stark warning to the growing number of entrepreneurs following celebrity chefs and opening restaurants, reveals research by our experts.

read more...

HMRC now issuing 58% of all petitions to wind up companies

As part of its debt collection offensive Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) now issues 58% of all the petitions to wind companies up, our research reveals. Five years ago the HMRC was responsible for just 42% of all the requests to wind companies up.*
read more...

World Gaming plc (AIM) in Administration

Following the announcement released by the Company on Monday 9 October relating to the suspension of trading, the Directors of World Gaming announce that they have now determined that they are unable to continue the Company’s US facing operations should the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“the Act”) be signed by the U.S. President.
read more...

Sportsman update

Andrew Andronikou and Peter Kubik, partners at our London office, are Joint Administrators of Sports Betting Media Ltd, publisher of The Sportsman newspaper.

read more...

Leading British manufacturer of catering equipment ceases to trade

Bartlett Catering Equipment, a British manufacturer of industrial catering equipment, has ceased to trade after its Joint Administrators, Andrew Andronikou and Peter Kubik, partners at our London office, were unable to secure a suitable purchaser.

read more...

The Sportsman newspaper put into administration

Andrew Andronikou and Peter Kubik, from our London office, have been appointed Joint Administrators of Sports Betting Media Ltd, publisher of The Sportsman newspaper.
read more...

Jobs saved at Comcatco after Administrators broker a sale to management

400 jobs have been saved at Comcatco Limited after Administrators from our London office succeeded in selling the business and its assets back to the management in a whirlwind deal.
read more...

TP8 Ltd placed into Administration

On Thursday 19 January 2006 Andrew Andronikou, Peter Kubik and Ladislav Hornan from our London office were appointed Joint Administrators to TP8 Ltd.
read more...

Turnaround and recovery team saves jobs at CTD Printers

Andrew Andronikou, Ladislav Hornan and Peter Kubik of our London office were appointed Joint Administrators over CTD Printers Limited on 21 November 2005.
read more...

Spotting the warning signs

Whether you are concerned about the health of your business or that of a customer, many of the early-warning signs of financial difficulty are the same.
read more...

Vertis Leicester placed into Administration

Vertis Limited has regrettably announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vertis Direct Marketing Services (Leicester) Limited, has been placed into Administration.
read more...

IP'S welcome Lord's 'Spectrum Plus' Decision

In 2001, the Privy Council reached a controversial decision in the 'Brumark' case. It effectively
read more...

Experts back buy-to-let crackdown

Insolvency experts have backed a Government crackdown on large buy-to-let property schemes in Ma
read more...

More companies winding up - new figures out today

The Department for Constitutional Affairs today published statistics for company winding up, and
read more...

Outdated tecniques costing lenders millions

Realistation and recovery procedures should be tightened up in order to benefit lenders, say ins
read more...

A guide to business recovery

Ed Cook, a partner in our turnaround and recovery department in Manchester:

"Turning a business around is all to do with timing. Businesses need to seek help at the first sign of trouble before it's too late for us to make a difference. In recent years, most banks have adopted this approach and we've seen a massive growth in the turnaround business as a result.
read more...

House of bath sold

Administrators from our London office have sold mail order company House of Bath as a going conc
read more...

A gaze into the buy-to-let crystal ball

Has the stall in the housing market put paid to the rush into buying-to-let?

Turnaround and recovery specialist Nick Hancock, partner at our Manchester office and advisor to numerous institutional lenders on property investment and matters, peers into his crystal ball.

The buoyancy of the UK housing market as a whole rests heavily on the buy-to-let sector, with an estimated 10-15% of all residential property transactions being carried out by investment landlords.

However, commentators are suggesting that investing in the buy-to-let market may no longer be an attractive proposition.
read more...

The changing face of Insolvency Practice

After working within the strict professional constraints of Insolvency Practice for many years,
read more...

Jobs saved as administrators sell bus company

Less than two weeks after being instructed by London bus company Wimco Group Coaches Limited, UH
read more...

Biting the bullet

It is a paradox of business that the inherent qualities entrepreneurial directors need to start
read more...

Spot the warning signs

Andrew Andronikou, a partner in the Turnaround and Recovery Department at the London office, pro
read more...

Are you comfortable with your controls?

Richard Simmons, partner at our Brighton office, recommends setting up an 'early warning system'
read more...

Latest publications

Mash Sport (UK) Limited - Information Memorandum

turnaround-and-recovery.gif

Please click the link to download the Information Memorandum for Mash Sport (UK) Limited - In Administration.
read more...

OEM plc: Report to creditors

A statutory meeting of creditors of OEM plc was duly convened and held pursuant to section 98 of the insolvency Act, 1986 on 4 March 2011. This document is the report for the first meeting of creditors.
read more...

Portsmouth FC: Completion report

The final report regarding the implementation and completion of the Company Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”) proposals.
read more...

Portsmouth FC: Final Progress Report to Creditors

This progress report provides detail of the trading activity and receipts and payments for the six month period, being 26 August 2010 to 24 February 2011.
read more...

Portsmouth FC: Proposed modifications & revised proposals

Statement setting out the Joint Supervisors’ proposed modifications and statement setting out the Joint Supervisors’ revised proposals.
read more...

Portsmouth FC: Six Month Progress Report to Creditors

Portsmouth FC Six Month Progress Report to Creditors

This report provides details of the trading activity and receipts and payments made during the six month period, being 26 February to 25 August 2010.
read more...

Portsmouth FC: Meeting of Creditors

Chairman's Report on the Meeting of Creditors of Portsmouth City Football Club Limited, held on 17 June 2010.
read more...

Portsmouth FC: Proposal for a Company Voluntary Arrangement

Portsmouth fc proposal

Proposal by the Joint Administrators for a Company Voluntary Arrangement. Pursuant to Part 1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the Insolvency Rules 1986.
read more...

Individual voluntary arrangements

Our guide to individual voluntary arrangements explains how an IVA is a real alternative to bankruptcy, for individuals facing increasing financial problems.
read more...

Recovery and insolvency

This document provides a guide to the services that our experienced turnaround and recovery team offers.
read more...

IVA personal information questionnaire

iva personal information

Please complete the IVA personal information questionnaire and return it to us, at which point we will be able to assess your situation and decide upon a suitable course of action.
read more...

Adding Value to Property Recovery

Adding Value to Property Recovery

This brochure provides details of the range of property services that we offer, including property management, strategic planning, investment advice and an overview of a portfolio.
read more...

Our charge out rates

To view the charge out rates of our Turnaround and recovery teams, please click on the bleow links:

London turnaround and recovery rates

Manchester turnaround and recovery rates
read more...

Subscribe